Das OEE-Protein 1 des Photosystem II (oxygen evolving enhancer) der Grünalge Scenedesmus obliquus besitzt Thioredoxin-Aktivität

Die Aminosäure-Sequenzierung an dem als "28 kDa-Thioredoxin f" beschriebenen Protein aus der Grünalge Scenedesmus obliquus hat gezeigt, dass dieses Protein mit dem als OEE bekannten Protein 1 aus dem Photosystem II identisch ist. Die früher postulierte Möglichkeit einer Fusion eines Thioredoxins mit einem Protein unbekannter Natur oder Insertion eines Thioredoxinfragments mit der typischen -Trp-Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys-Sequenz in ein solches Protein hat sich nicht bestätigt. Durch Anwendung einer auf das 33 kDa OEE-Protein ausgerichteten Präparationsmethode konnte gezeigt werden, dass das "28 kDa-Trx f" tatsächlich in den Thylakoidmembranen lokalisiert ist. Das Protein kann so innerhalb eines Tages in hoher Reinheit aus den Thylakoidmembranfragmenten eines Algenrohhomogenats isoliert werden; dabei bleibt die Fähigkeit des OEE-Proteins das chloroplastidäre Enzym Fructosebisphosphatase (FbPase) zu stimulieren erhalten. Mit gleichen Methoden wurden die Grünalgen Chlorella vulgaris und Chlamydomonas reinhardtii auf außergewöhnliche Proteine mit Trx-f Aktivität untersucht. Die hitze- und säurestabile Proteinfraktion aus Chlorella vulgaris enthält ein Protein mit vergleichbarer Molmasse von 26 kDa, das ähnlich wie in Scenedesmus eine Stimulation der chloroplastidären Fructosebisphosphatase zeigt. In dem hitze- und säurestabilen Proteinextrakt aus Chlamydomonas reinhardtii wird solche Aktivität nicht beobachtet. Eine Probe des rekombinanten, homogenen OEE-Proteins aus Spinat wurde auf Stimulation der chloroplastidären FbPase und NADPH-abhängigen Malatdehydrogenase (MDH) untersucht. Das Spinat OEE-Protein 1 zeigt mit diesen Enzymen keine Aktivität. Da das OEE-Protein 1 in Scenedesmus starke FbPase-Stimulation zeigt, die anderen Scenedesmus-Thioredoxine mit Molmassen von 12 kDa (Trx I und II) jedoch hohe Aktivität mit der zellulären Ribonucleotidreduktase zeigen, wird postuliert, dass das OEE-Protein die Funktion des Trx-f in vivo ersetzt.

Posttranslationale Modifikationen und Interaktionspartner der Heterochromatin Protein 1-Homologe HcpA und HcpB in Dictyostelium discoideum

Die Epigenetik repräsentiert einen Teilbereich der Genetik, der sich mit Regulationsmechanismen befasst, welche Einfluss auf die Genexpression nehmen und dabei nicht auf Veränderungen in der DNA-Sequenz beruhen. Ein verbreiteter Mechanismus beruht auf der Kontrolle des Kondensationsgrades der DNA durch posttranslationale Modifizierung von Proteinen. Die Proteine können ein struktureller Bestandteil des Chromatins oder aber an dessen Etablierung und Aufrechterhaltung beteiligt sein. Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) ist ein Schlüsselprotein bei der Bildung und Aufrechterhaltung heterochromatischer Strukturen. Zudem erfüllt es eine Reihe weiterer Funktionen und interagiert mit einer Vielzahl von Proteinen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit konnte gezeigt werden, dass die HP1-Homologe aus Dictyostelium discoideum umfangreich mit posttranslationalen Modifikationen versehen sind. Eine in der als Interaktionsdomäne bezeichneten Chromo-Shadow-Domäne gelegene Acetylierung steht zumindest in HcpB im Zusammenhang mit der Bildung von Heterochromatin. Darüber hinaus konnte gezeigt werden, dass HcpB physisch mit der Histonmethyltransferase SuvA interagiert. Der Einfluss der oben genannten Acetylierung auf die Bildung von Heterochromatin könnte dabei sowohl auf der Kontrolle der Homo- bzw. Heterodimerisierung als auch auf der Kontrolle der Interaktion mit SuvA beruhen. Die hohe Konservierung von HP1-Proteinen führt zu der Frage, ob das humane Homolog HP1α die endogenen HP1-Homologe in Dictyostelium discoideum kompensieren kann. Während humanes HP1α in der Lage ist im Einzel-Knockout mit heterochromatischen Strukturen zu assoziieren scheint der Knockout des zweiten Homologes letal zu sein. Dies legt nahe, dass HP1α nur einen Teil der Funktionen übernehmen kann. Um Interaktionspartner von HcpA und HcpB zu bestimmen wurden mit bioinformatischen Methoden drei Proteine aus Dictyostelium als potentielle Komponenten des Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 (CAF1) identifiziert und untersucht. Vorhergehende Experimente aus anderen Arbeiten stützen die Annahme, dass es sich hierbei um Komponenten des Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 handelt.

Untersuchungen zur Biofilmbildung bei dem klinischen Isolat Enterococcus faecalis 1.10

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde die Biofilmbildung bei einem klinischen Isolat von Enterococcus faecalis untersucht. Der Prozess der Biofilmbildung ist in mehrere Abschnitte unterteilt und beinhaltet zu Beginn eine Anhaftung von Zellen an Oberflächen. Dieser adhäsive Schritt wird unter anderem durch Pili vermittelt. Pili bei Grampositiven Mikroorganismen sind kovalent mit der Zellwand verknüpfte Proteinstrukturen, die eine Anheftung an biotische und abiotische Oberflächen sowie den Zell-Zell-Kontakt vermitteln. Bei den Analysen dieser Doktorarbeit lag ein besonderes Interesse bei eben diesen Pili, die für Enterococcus faecalis die Namen Ebp (endocarditis and biofilm associated pili) und Bee (biofilm enhancer in enterococci) tragen. Codiert werden sie durch die entsprechenden ebp-/bee-Loci, deren Aufbau unter den Grampositiven Mikroorganismen hochkonserviert ist. Die Loci bestehen aus Pilusuntereinheiten-codierenden Genen und colokalisierten Pilus-spezifischen Sortase Genen. Während in der Regel drei verschiedene Pilusuntereinheiten vorliegen, kann die Anzahl der Sortasen zwischen einer und zwei variieren. Bei den Experimenten wurde neben einer Komplementationsstudie zu einer Bee-Pilus Defekt-Mutante (1.10.16) das Hauptaugenmerk auf die Analyse des zweiten Pilus (Ebp) gelegt, um die Pilisituation bei Isolat 1.10 im Detail darzustellen Zusätzlich sollten weitere Oberflächenassoziierte Proteinstrukturen bei Isolat 1.10 detektiert werden, die gegebenenfalls an der Biofilmbildung beteiligt sind. Weitere Versuche zur Charakterisierung des Bee-Pilus wurden im Laufe dieser Arbeit durchgeführt, blieben jedoch bisher erfolglos. Die Biofilm-/Pilus-Defekt-Mutante 1.10.16 zeigte aufgrund einer Punktmutation (Pm) in der Pilus-spezifischen Sortase 1 des bee-Locus eine geschwächte Fähigkeit zur Anheftung an abiotische Oberflächen, sowie das Fehlen der Bee2 Untereinheit im Pilus. Nach Komplementation der Mutante (1.10.16K) mit dem Wildtyp-srt1 Gen, wurde die starke Biofilmbildungsfähigkeit zurück erlangt. Die Experimente zeigten, dass der Pilus-Defekt auf die Pm im srt1 Gen zurückzuführen war und der Bee-Pilus in Stamm 1.10.16K wieder korrekt gebildet wurde. Zu sehen war dies in Rasterelektronenmikroskopischen Aufnahmen und ebenfalls im massenspektrometrischen Nachweis aller 3 Pilusuntereinheiten im Bee-Pilus charakteristischen High-Molecular-Weight Komplex (~ 250 kDa). Durch Sequenzierungen konnte gezeigt werden, dass zwei Gene des ebp-Locus (ebpR und ebpC) bei Isolat 1.10 durch die Insertion von IS-Elementen IS1062 und IS6770 inaktiviert wurden. Der proteinbiochemische Nachweis über Pilusspezifische Antikörper gegen die Untereinheiten des Ebp-Pilus verlief negativ. Zusätzlich konnte gezeigt werden, dass die mRNA der beiden inaktivierten Gene nicht gebildet wurde. Dies führte folglich zum vollständigen Verlust des Ebp-Pilus bei Isolat 1.10. Zusammen mit den Ergebnissen der Komplementation konnte somit der große Einfluss mindestens eines intakten Pilus auf die Biofilmbildung gezeigt werden. Sind beide Pili durch Insertionen bzw. Mutationen inaktiviert, kommt es zu einer deutlichen Abnahme der Biofilmbildungsstärke. Dass trotzdem noch ein Biofilm gebildet wurde, zeigt den multifaktoriellen Zusammenhang bzw. Einfluss im Biofilmbildungsprozess. Über das gezielte Markieren von Oberflächenproteinen intakter Zellen mittels der Oberflächenbiotinylierung, konnten in der SDS-PAGE Unterschiede im Bandenmuster im Vergleich zur unbehandelten Probe erkannt werden. Die massenspektrometrische Identifikation dieser Proteine erfolgte bisher nicht, jedoch sind diese vorläufigen Ergebnisse vielversprechender Natur für die Identifikation und Aufklärung der Oberflächenproteinsituation bei Isolat 1.10.

Nuclear organisation and epigenetic regulation of gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum

A series of vectors for the over-expression of tagged proteins in Dictyostelium were designed, constructed and tested. These vectors allow the addition of an N- or C-terminal tag (GFP, RFP, 3xFLAG, 3xHA, 6xMYC and TAP) with an optimized polylinker sequence and no additional amino acid residues at the N or C terminus. Different selectable markers (Blasticidin and gentamicin) are available as well as an extra chromosomal version; these allow copy number and thus expression level to be controlled, as well as allowing for more options with regard to complementation, co- and super-transformation. Finally, the vectors share standardized cloning sites, allowing a gene of interest to be easily transfered between the different versions of the vectors as experimental requirements evolve. The organisation and dynamics of the Dictyostelium nucleus during the cell cycle was investigated. The centromeric histone H3 (CenH3) variant serves to target the kinetochore to the centromeres and thus ensures correct chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. A number of Dictyostelium histone H3-domain containing proteins as GFP-tagged fusions were expressed and it was found that one of them functions as CenH3 in this species. Like CenH3 from some other species, Dictyostelium CenH3 has an extended N-terminal domain with no similarity to any other known proteins. The targeting domain, comprising α-helix 2 and loop 1 of the histone fold is required for targeting CenH3 to centromeres. Compared to the targeting domain of other known and putative CenH3 species, Dictyostelium CenH3 has a shorter loop 1 region. The localisation of a variety of histone modifications and histone modifying enzymes was examined. Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and CenH3 chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP) it was shown that the six telocentric centromeres contain all of the DIRS-1 and most of the DDT-A and skipper transposons. During interphase the centromeres remain attached to the centrosome resulting in a single CenH3 cluster which also contains the putative histone H3K9 methyltransferase SuvA, H3K9me3 and HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1). Except for the centromere cluster and a number of small foci at the nuclear periphery opposite the centromeres, the rest of the nucleus is largely devoid of transposons and heterochromatin associated histone modifications. At least some of the small foci correspond to the distal telomeres, suggesting that the chromosomes are organised in a Rabl-like manner. It was found that in contrast to metazoans, loading of CenH3 onto Dictyostelium centromeres occurs in late G2 phase. Transformation of Dictyostelium with vectors carrying the G418 resistance cassette typically results in the vector integrating into the genome in one or a few tandem arrays of approximately a hundred copies. In contrast, plasmids containing a Blasticidin resistance cassette integrate as single or a few copies. The behaviour of transgenes in the nucleus was examined by FISH, and it was found that low copy transgenes show apparently random distribution within the nucleus, while transgenes with more than approximately 10 copies cluster at or immediately adjacent to the centromeres in interphase cells regardless of the actual integration site along the chromosome. During mitosis the transgenes show centromere-like behaviour, and ChIP experiments show that transgenes contain the heterochromatin marker H3K9me2 and the centromeric histone variant H3v1. This clustering, and centromere-like behaviour was not observed on extrachromosomal transgenes, nor on a line where the transgene had integrated into the extrachromosomal rDNA palindrome. This suggests that it is the repetitive nature of the transgenes that causes the centromere-like behaviour. A Dictyostelium homolog of DET1, a protein largely restricted to multicellular eukaryotes where it has a role in developmental regulation was identified. As in other species Dictyostelium DET1 is nuclear localised. In ChIP experiments DET1 was found to bind the promoters of a number of developmentally regulated loci. In contrast to other species where it is an essential protein, loss of DET1 is not lethal in Dictyostelium, although viability is greatly reduced. Loss of DET1 results in delayed and abnormal development with enlarged aggregation territories. Mutant slugs displayed apparent cell type patterning with a bias towards pre-stalk cell types.

DNA methylation in Dictyostelium discoideum

DNA methyltransferases of type Dnmt2 are a highly conserved protein family with enigmatic function. The aim of this work was to characterize DnmA, the Dnmt2 methyltransferase in Dictyostelium discoideum, and further to investigate its implication in DNA methylation and transcriptional gene silencing. The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium encodes DnmA as the sole DNA methyltransferase. The enzyme bears all ten characteristic DNA methyltransferase motifs in its catalytic domain. The DnmA mRNA was found by RT-PCR to be expressed during vegetative growth and down regulated during development. Investigations using fluorescence microscopy showed that both DnmA-myc and DnmA-GFP fusions predominantly localised to the nucleus. The function of DnmA remained initially unclear, but later experiment revealed that the enzyme is an active DNA methyltransferase responsible for all DNA (cytosine) methylation in Dictyostelium. Neither in gel retardation assays, nor by the yeast two hybrid system, clues on the functionality of DnmA could be obtained. However, immunological detection of the methylation mark with an α - 5mC antibody gave initial evidence that the DNA of Dictyostelium was methylated. Furthermore, addition of 5-aza-cytidine as demethylating agent to the Dictyostelium medium and subsequent in vitro incubation of the DNA isolated from these cells with recombinant DnmA showed that the enzyme binds slightly better to this target DNA. In order to investigate further the function of the protein, a gene knock-out for dnmA was generated. The gene was successfully disrupted by homologous recombination, the knock-out strain, however, did not show any obvious phenotype under normal laboratory conditions. To identify specific target sequences for DNA methylation, a microarray analysis was carried out. Setting a threshold of at least 1.5 fold for differences in the strength of gene expression, several such genes in the knock-out strain were chosen for further investigation. Among the up-regulated genes were the ESTs representing the gag and the RT genes respectively of the retrotransposon skipper. In addition Northern blot analysis confirmed the up-regulation of skipper in the DnmA knock-out strain. Bisufite treatment and sequencing of specific DNA stretches from skipper revealed that DnmA is responsible for methylation of mostly asymmetric cytosines. Together with skipper, DIRS-1 retrotransposon was found later also to be methylated but was not present on the microarray. Furthermore, skipper transcription was also up-regulated in strains that had genes disrupted encoding components of the RNA interference pathway. In contrast, DIRS 1 expression was not affected by a loss of DnmA but was strongly increased in the strain that had the RNA directed RNA polymerase gene rrpC disrupted. Strains generated by propagating the usual wild type Ax2 and the DnmA knock-out cells over 16 rounds in development were analyzed for transposon activity. Northern blot analysis revealed activation for skipper expression, but not for DIRS-1. A large number of siRNAs were found to be correspondent to the DIRS-1 sequence, suggesting concerted regulation of DIRS-1 expression by RNAi and DNA methylation. In contrast, no siRNAs corresponding to the standard skipper element were found. The data show that DNA methylation plays a crucial role in epigenetic gene regulation in Dictyostelium and that different, partially overlapping mechanisms control transposon silencing for skipper and DIRS-1. To elucidate the mechanism of targeting the protein to particular genes in the Dictyostelium genome, some more genes which were up-regulated in the DnmA knock-out strain were analyzed by bisulfite sequencing. The chosen genes are involved in the multidrug response in other species, but their function in Dictyostelium is uncertain. Bisulfite data showed that two of these genes were methylated at asymmetrical C-residues in the wild type, but not in DnmA knock-out cells. This suggested that DNA methylation in Dictyostelium is involved not only in transposon regulation but also in transcriptional silencing of specific genes.

Heterochromatin und epigenetische Kontrolle der Centromere in Dictyostelium discoideum

Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) is an evolutionarily conserved protein required for formation of a higher-order chromatin structures and epigenetic gene silencing. The objective of the present work was to functionally characterise HP1-like proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum, and to investigate their function in heterochromatin formation and transcriptional gene silencing. The Dictyostelium genome encodes three HP1-like proteins (hcpA, hcpB, hcpC), from which only two, hcpA and hcpB, but not hcpC were found to be expressed during vegetative growth and under developmental conditions. Therefore, hcpC, albeit no obvious pseudogene, was excluded from this study. Both HcpA and HcpB show the characteristic conserved domain structure of HP1 proteins, consisting of an N-terminal chromo domain and a C-terminal chromo shadow domain, which are separated by a hinge. Both proteins show all biochemical activities characteristic for HP1 proteins, such as homo- and heterodimerisation in vitro and in vivo, and DNA binding activtity. HcpA furthermore seems to bind to K9-methylated histone H3 in vitro. The proteins thus appear to be structurally and functionally conserved in Dictyostelium. The proteins display largely identical subnuclear distribution in several minor foci and concentration in one major cluster at the nuclear periphery. The localisation of this cluster adjacent to the nucleus-associated centrosome and its mitotic behaviour strongly suggest that it represents centromeric heterochromatin. Furthermore, it is characterised by histone H3 lysine-9 dimethylation (H3K9me2), which is another hallmark of Dictyostelium heterochromatin. Therefore, one important aspect of the work was to characterise the so-far largely unknown structural organisation of centromeric heterochromatin. The Dictyostelium homologue of inner centromere protein INCENP (DdINCENP), co-localized with both HcpA and H3K9me2 during metaphase, providing further evidence that H3K9me2 and HcpA/B localisation represent centromeric heterochromatin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) showed that two types of high-copy number retrotransposons (DIRS-1 and skipper), which form large irregular arrays at the chromosome ends, which are thought to contain the Dictyostelium centromeres, are characterised by H3K9me2. Neither overexpression of full-length HcpA or HcpB, nor deletion of single Hcp isoforms resulted in changes in retrotransposon transcript levels. However, overexpression of a C-terminally truncated HcpA protein, assumed to display a dominant negative effect, lead to an increase in skipper retrotransposon transcript levels. Furthermore, overexpression of this protein lead to severe growth defects in axenic suspension culture and reduced cell viability. In order to elucidate the proteins functions in centromeric heterochromatin formation, gene knock-outs for both hcpA and hcpB were generated. Both genes could be successfully targeted and disrupted by homologous recombination. Surprisingly, the degree of functional redundancy of the two isoforms was, although not unexpected, very high. Both single knock-out mutants did not show any obvious phenotypes under standard laboratory conditions and only deletion of hcpA resulted in subtle growth phenotypes when grown at low temperature. All attempts to generate a double null mutant failed. However, both endogenous genes could be disrupted in cells in which a rescue construct that ectopically expressed one of the isoforms either with N-terminal 6xHis- or GFP-tag had been introduced. The data imply that the presence of at least one Hcp isoform is essential in Dictyostelium. The lethality of the hcpA/hcpB double mutant thus greatly hampered functional analysis of the two genes. However, the experiment provided genetic evidence that the GFP-HcpA fusion protein, because of its ability to compensate the loss of the endogenous HcpA protein, was a functional protein. The proteins displayed quantitative differences in dimerisation behaviour, which are conferred by the slightly different hinge and chromo shadow domains at the C-termini. Dimerisation preferences in increasing order were HcpA-HcpA << HcpA-HcpB << HcpB-HcpB. Overexpression of GFP-HcpA or a chimeric protein containing the HcpA C-terminus (GFP-HcpBNAC), but not overexpression of GFP-HcpB or GFP-HcpANBC, lead to increased frequencies of anaphase bridges in late mitotic cells, which are thought to be caused by telomere-telomere fusions. Chromatin targeting of the two proteins is achieved by at least two distinct mechanisms. The N-terminal chromo domain and hinge of the proteins are required for targeting to centromeric heterochromatin, while the C-terminal portion encoding the CSD is required for targeting to several other chromatin regions at the nuclear periphery that are characterised by H3K9me2. Targeting to centromeric heterochromatin likely involves direct binding to DNA. The Dictyostelium genome encodes for all subunits of the origin recognition complex (ORC), which is a possible upstream component of HP1 targeting to chromatin. Overexpression of GFP-tagged OrcB, the Dictyostelium Orc2 homologue, showed a distinct nuclear localisation that partially overlapped with the HcpA distribution. Furthermore, GFP-OrcB localized to the centrosome during the entire cell cycle, indicating an involvement in centrosome function. DnmA is the sole DNA methyltransferase in Dictyostelium required for all DNA(cytosine-)methylation. To test for its in vivo activity, two different cell lines were established that ectopically expressed DnmA-myc or DnmA-GFP. It was assumed that overexpression of these proteins might cause an increase in the 5-methyl-cytosine(5-mC)-levels in the genomic DNA due to genomic hypermethylation. Although DnmA-GFP showed preferential localisation in the nucleus, no changes in the 5-mC-levels in the genomic DNA could be detected by capillary electrophoresis.